Demo state
V0.2 · plant-command prototype

Seeded cross-application scenarios and session-local decisions only.

Native workflows
0 production workflows
Core enforcement
Preview only
Compliant signatures
Not available

Supplier quality dossier

Supplier Quality

Qualification posture, risk, agreements, findings and decision history in one evidence-led profile.

Supplier profileSUP-DEMO-003

External laboratory qualification

A seeded external-laboratory dossier awaiting definition of quality responsibilities.
Awaiting quality agreementTier 2 · medium
Supplier identity
Demonstration laboratory
Service
External analytical testing
Approved sites
None established
Requalification
31 Jul 2026
Quality risk

Risk summary

Medium · quality agreement gap risk
Quality responsibilities and source-backed capability evidence are incomplete.
Affected object
External analytical testing service
Initial risk
High · unallocated responsibilities
Residual risk
Not accepted

Effective controls

  • Resolve quality-responsibility matrix
  • Review analytical capability evidence
  • Confirm approved site scope

Decision rationale

Qualification cannot be presented as approved while the quality agreement and authoritative evidence are unavailable.
Source-grouped evidence

Qualification evidence

Evidence readiness

Supplier qualification evidence

Supplier posture is represented, but the controlled quality agreement, approved-site scope and external capability evidence remain incomplete or unavailable.Incomplete
SupplierQualification and quality agreement evidenceQuality responsibilities unresolvedIncomplete
SUP-DEMO-003Seeded
External laboratory qualification and quality-agreement posture.
Freshness / timestamp
Current to seeded state · 19 Jul 2026
Integrity / provenance
Seeded Sentinel supplier-quality record
Decision relevance
Required to establish supplier qualification posture and restrictions.
Missing expected evidence
Executed quality agreement, approved site scope and authoritative qualification decision
External laboratoryAnalytical capability evidenceTechnical evidence not source-connectedAwaiting source
LAB-CAPABILITY-PLACEHOLDERPlaceholder
Analytical capability, method scope and accreditation context.
Freshness / timestamp
Technical review represented 21 May 2026
Integrity / provenance
Seeded scenario · external source unavailable
Decision relevance
Supports capability and risk-tier assessment.
Missing expected evidence
Source-backed capability evidence, approved site identity and current accreditation context

Inspection unavailable in this shell · placeholder

ImprintControlled quality agreementRendered agreement unavailableNot connected
AGR-DEMO-002Placeholder
Expected controlled quality agreement and obligation matrix.
Freshness / timestamp
Not synchronized
Integrity / provenance
Unavailable Imprint relationship placeholder
Decision relevance
Defines responsibilities, escalation and data-retention obligations.
Missing expected evidence
Rendered controlled agreement, Core effective state and signatures

Inspection unavailable in this shell · placeholder

Quality history

Chronology

  1. Qualification assessment opened

    Stage state: Demonstration

    Demonstration supplier-quality record created from Core and Procurement context.

  2. Technical evidence reviewed

    Stage state: Partial

    Analytical capability evidence is represented but not source-connected.

  3. Quality agreement gap identified

    Stage state: Open

    Quality responsibilities remain unagreed in the seeded scenario.

  4. Qualification review due

    Stage state: Due

    No authoritative approval can be recorded in this shell.
Module scope and controlled ownership

Defined module areas

  • Supplier Qualification
  • Quality Assessments
  • Supplier Audits
  • Approved Supplier Status
  • Performance Monitoring
  • Supplier Changes
  • Supplier Deviations
  • Quality Agreements
  • External Laboratories
  • Contract Manufacturers
  • Service Providers
  • Supplier Quality Register

Sentinel ownership

  • GMP qualification
  • Approved quality status
  • Quality agreements
  • Supplier quality monitoring

Authority boundary

Prism and Depot provide analytical, receipt, condition and delivery evidence for QA evaluation.

Implementation stateDefined shell · non-authoritative
  • Workflow, persistence, electronic signatures and compliant audit trails are not implemented.