Demo state
V0.2 · plant-command prototype

Seeded cross-application scenarios and session-local decisions only.

Native workflows
0 production workflows
Core enforcement
Preview only
Compliant signatures
Not available

Controlled package governance

Assessment Governance

Human reviewers govern quality and traceability before controlled publication to Competency.

Assessment packageASP-DEMO-004

Environmental monitoring SOP assessment

Augustus drafted this seeded package. SMEs and technical reviewers assess content; Sentinel governs controlled approval where required.
Awaiting QA approval
Purpose
Verify environmental monitoring knowledge
Source SOP
DOC-DEMO-017 · unavailable
Owner
QA Learning Governance
Publication target
Competency · not connected
  1. Drafted in AugustuscompleteDemonstration draft
  2. SME ReviewcompleteComplete in scenario
  3. Technical ApprovalcurrentAwaiting traceability review
  4. QA GovernancecurrentCurrent
  5. Published to CompetencyupcomingNot available
  6. EffectiveupcomingNot available
  7. SupersededupcomingFuture state
Coverage review

Question and critical-content coverage

Question coverageRepresentedDemonstration package structure only
Critical-question coverageHuman review requiredSource traceability remains outstanding
Technical reviewersSME + QA learning governanceNo electronic signature or durable approval
Revision impactOpenCHG-DEMO-006 and DOC-DEMO-017
Source-grouped evidence

Assessment approval evidence

Evidence readiness

Assessment governance evidence

Augustus draft provenance is represented, while the controlled source SOP, human traceability decision and Competency publication target remain incomplete or unavailable.Incomplete
AugustusDraft-generation provenanceDraft represented; human traceability review requiredSufficient with conditions
ASP-DEMO-004Seeded
Seeded assessment package drafted in Augustus.
Freshness / timestamp
Current to seeded state · 19 Jul 2026
Integrity / provenance
Draft-generation provenance only
Decision relevance
Provides draft content for human technical and QA governance review.
Missing expected evidence
Human source-traceability confirmation and technical decision
ImprintControlled source SOPRendered source procedure unavailableAwaiting source
DOC-DEMO-017Seeded
Expected controlled source for coverage and critical-question traceability.
Freshness / timestamp
Seeded 23 Jul 2026
Integrity / provenance
Seeded Imprint relationship · source text unavailable
Decision relevance
Required to verify question coverage against the Core-authorized effective procedure.
Missing expected evidence
Rendered effective SOP, canonical Core version and controlled source text
CompetencyPublication targetNo publication or learner-delivery stateNot connected
CMP-PUB-UNAVAILABLEUnavailable
Expected controlled assessment publication target.
Freshness / timestamp
Not synchronized
Integrity / provenance
Expected Competency source · no adapter connected
Decision relevance
Required only after human technical and QA governance review.
Missing expected evidence
Publication identity and effective state

Inspection unavailable in this shell · unavailable

Competency boundary. Learner attempts, scoring, remediation and qualification decisions remain in Competency. Sentinel does not decide that an individual is competent.

Module scope and controlled ownership

Defined module areas

  • Draft Packages
  • Awaiting Author Review
  • Awaiting SME Review
  • Awaiting Competency Review
  • Awaiting QA Approval
  • Approved Packages
  • Effective Packages
  • Superseded Packages
  • Publication Status
  • Assessment Register

Sentinel ownership

  • Human review history
  • GMP adequacy review
  • Controlled package approval
  • Publication governance

Authority boundary

Learner attempts, scoring, remediation and qualification decisions remain in Competency.

Implementation stateDefined shell · non-authoritative
  • Workflow, persistence, electronic signatures and compliant audit trails are not implemented.